Tables
one and two below demonstrate that solvent that has undergone the
SystemOne Chemical
analysis of samples and reports that relate only to the |
An advisory control limit of 20% for RPD is appropriate for original and duplicate sample values |
||
Table
1
Relative Percent Differences (RPDs) for Recycled Product Flash Point Measurements vs. New Product |
||
Sample
Location ID
|
Flash
Point
|
Relative
Percent Difference (RPD) to new product
|
V-1
|
145
|
new
product
|
M-1
|
160
|
9.8%
|
M-2
|
150
|
3.4%
|
M-3
|
155
|
6.7%
|
M-4
|
150
|
3.4%
|
M-5
|
155
|
6.7%
|
M-6
|
153
|
5.4%
|
Average
RPD
|
6%
|
|
Table
2
Relative Percent Differences (RPDs) for Recycled Product EPA 8015M Measurements vs. New Product |
||
Sample
Location ID
|
mg
pure produce per
kilogram of sample |
Relative
Percent Difference (RPD) vs. 100% pure product
|
V-1
|
956,000
or 95.6% pure product
|
4.4%
|
M-1
|
961,000
or 96.1% pure product
|
3.9%
|
M-2
|
877,000
or 87.1% pure product
|
13.1%
|
M-3
|
1,009,000
or 109% pure product
|
8.6%
|
M-4
|
860,000
or 96.2% pure product
|
15%
|
M-5
|
962,000
or 96.2% pure product
|
3.8%
|
M-6
|
887,000
or 88.7% pure product
|
12%
|
Average
Relative Percent Difference (RPD)
|
8.6%
|
|
Tables 1 and 2 above demonstrate that the new Ashland solvent 140-66 and the solvent after it has undergone the Mansur recycling are the same mineral spirit solvent. The average RPD of 6% for the flash point for the samples vs. the new product, and the average RPD of 9% for EPA Method 8015M results vs. the expected 100% recovery, show that the recycled product has not changed during the recycling process. Further, no individual RPDs were above the EPA Fundamental Guidelines of 20% for duplicate analysis | ||